Practical AI guidance for lawyers. No jargon, no product pitches — just clear, honest guidance to help you navigate AI responsibly and confidently.
Lawyers are being asked to make real decisions about AI tools — what to use, what to avoid, and what their duties to clients require — without much support. That's where I come in.
"I'm not here to sell you on AI. I'm here to help you understand it well enough to decide for yourself."
The ABA and state bars are actively issuing guidance on AI use. Understanding your competence obligations isn't optional — it's part of practice.
AI tools handle data in ways that aren't always obvious. Knowing what not to put into a prompt is just as important as knowing how to use one.
There are thousands of AI tools and a lot of hype. You don't need all of it — you need to understand what's relevant to your practice.
Guidance grounded in how small firms and solo practitioners actually work — not enterprise software rollouts or BigLaw budgets.
Every engagement starts with a conversation. I don't come in with a pre-packaged solution — I start by understanding where you are and what you actually need.
A free 30-minute conversation to understand your practice, the tools you're using (or considering), and where you have questions or concerns about AI.
A tailored written summary of your current AI landscape, practical recommendations, and a clear framework for responsible use — built around your practice area and client base.
A focused session for you or your team covering AI basics, the ABA guidance landscape, confidentiality considerations, and what responsible adoption looks like in practice.
AI is changing constantly. For firms that want a consistent resource to check in with — to review new tools, talk through questions, or stay current — ongoing advisory keeps you covered.
I spent nearly a decade in product development and technology before going to law school — working across legaltech, observability, and strategic partnerships at companies where I watched the gap between what technology can do and what people actually understand about it grow wider every year.
That gap matters more in law than almost anywhere else. Lawyers have real duties — to clients, to the court, to the profession — and AI is landing in their laps whether they asked for it or not. Most of the resources out there are either too technical, too vague, or trying to sell something. I'm not doing any of those things.
My background is in complex systems — I studied biology and conservation sciences as an undergrad and hold a master's in complex systems. I think in ecosystems: what connects to what, where the pressure points are, and who bears the consequences when something goes wrong. That lens turns out to be surprisingly useful for thinking about AI in legal practice.
I'm currently entering my second year of law school and am pursuing credentials in AI governance and privacy. I'm also a mom, which means I have exactly zero patience for things that are more complicated than they need to be.
My goal is simple: help lawyers understand AI well enough to make confident, responsible decisions — for their practices and for their clients. You don't have to become an AI expert. You just need to know enough to ask the right questions.
Every engagement starts with a free 30-minute discovery call. I'll ask about your practice, what tools you're using or considering, and where you have questions. No pitch, no pressure.